RIXA Advisory

RIXA package

AI Governance Evidence Sprint

For leadership, compliance, finance, HR, IT or operations teams that need to structure AI use cases, accountable owners, data boundaries, vendor dependencies, review controls and evidence actions.

Problem

Why this matters

AI decisions are often discussed but not converted into a retained inventory, control evidence, owner decisions, escalation rules and management-ready actions.

Outcome

What RIXA delivers

A human-reviewed governance evidence pack with source-linked findings, a control/evidence matrix, evidence requests, management decisions and a 30 / 60 / 90 roadmap.

What the client receives

Concrete deliverables

AI use-case and ownership register
AI governance findings register
Control/evidence matrix
Evidence request tracker
Permitted-use and escalation decisions
Management brief
30 / 60 / 90 action plan

Business risk

Consequences of leaving it unresolved

Unclear AI accountability
Shadow or unapproved AI use
Weak data and vendor boundaries
No retained human-review evidence
Management decisions without traceability

Process

How the sprint works

01

Confirm scope and decision boundary

Define the priority AI use cases, accountable owners, business context and the management question the sprint must answer.

02

Map controls and retained evidence

Connect ownership, data and vendor boundaries, human-review controls, approvals and retained evidence to the use cases in scope.

03

Identify evidence gaps and actions

Separate confirmed gaps from assumptions, then create source-linked findings, evidence requests, owners and remediation priorities.

04

Deliver the reviewed management pack

Provide the governance register, control/evidence matrix, management brief and a practical 30 / 60 / 90 action plan.

Proof before purchase

See the structure management can receive

See a fictional example of how RIXA connects source evidence, findings, owners and actions before deciding whether the format fits your need.

Professional limits

What this package is not

Not generic AI training
Not a legal AI Act classification opinion
Not model validation or technical security testing
Not compliance certification
Requires client and human reviewer validation

FAQ

Is this only a workshop?

No. A working session may be included, but the product is the reviewed evidence pack and action plan.

How is it different from the Quick Scan?

The Quick Scan covers up to five priority use cases and produces a compact baseline. The Evidence Sprint provides deeper evidence mapping, findings, controls, traceability and management outputs.

How is this different from the EU AI Act Readiness Review?

AI Act Readiness focuses on role, applicability, risk-classification triggers and documentation readiness. The Evidence Sprint focuses on operating AI governance: owners, controls, permitted use, human review, retained evidence and management decisions. AI Act screening is included only where relevant triggers are in scope.

Next step

Start with a defined AI governance evidence question.